"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please." (Mark Twain)

Monday, December 19, 2005

A Mainstream Journalist Uses the "I-Word" 

Jonathan Alter drops a couple of bombs (emphasis supplied):
I learned this week that on December 6, Bush summoned Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger and executive editor Bill Keller to the Oval Office in a futile attempt to talk them out of running the story. The Times will not comment on the meeting,
but one can only imagine the president’s desperation.

The problem was not that the disclosures would compromise national security, as Bush claimed at his press conference. His comparison to the damaging pre-9/11 revelation of Osama bin Laden’s use of a satellite phone, which caused bin Laden to change tactics, is fallacious; any Americans with ties to Muslim extremists—in fact, all American Muslims, period—have long since suspected that the U.S. government might be listening in to their conversations. Bush claimed that “the fact that we are discussing this program is helping the enemy.” But there is simply no evidence, or even reasonable presumption, that this is so. And rather than the leaking being a “shameful act,” it was the work of a patriot inside the government who was trying to stop a presidential power grab.

No, Bush was desperate to keep the Times from running this important story—which the paper had already inexplicably held for a year—because he knew that it would reveal him as a law-breaker. He insists he had “legal authority derived from the Constitution and congressional resolution authorizing force.” But the Constitution explicitly requires the president to obey the law. And the post 9/11 congressional resolution authorizing “all necessary force” in fighting terrorism was made in clear reference to military intervention. It did not scrap the Constitution and allow the president to do whatever he pleased in any area in the name of fighting terrorism....

This will all play out eventually in congressional committees and in the United States Supreme Court. If the Democrats regain control of Congress, there may even be articles of impeachment introduced. Similar abuse of power was part of the impeachment charge brought against Richard Nixon in 1974.

Remember, we've only done half the job if Chimpy is the only one impeached - President Cheney has to go, too. He's in this scandal up to his yarbles; why else would Sen. Jay Rockefeller have addressed his "I'm saving a copy of this note in a secret location, so don't even think of causing any 'accidents'" letter to "Dear Mr. Vice President?"

Bottom line: This government must fall.




While I agree (wholeheartedly) with the sentiments expressed in your post. I gotta point out that Eric Alterman is far from a mainstream journalist. Oh, he may be published in MSM literature, but he's rated as one of the most liberal (if not THE most liberal)big name journalists in the country. Using him as a reference causes anyone with an ounce of right in them to switch channels. (Think of your reaction to a story by Rush L.... 'nuff said).

That being said, major coup for Mr Alterman, scooping this story.

Larry B
Um ... that's Jonathan Alter (from Newsweek), not Eric Alterman.

(Ironically, I've been pushing reading comprehension with my 8 yr old. Physician, heal thyself...)
Post a Comment